Myth-Busting Modern Biology with Tom Cowan

What some scientists call "exosomes" are just particles, possibly appear in the process of tissue decomposition or be forms of communication at the tissue level, but this is not known for sure either 

 

Scientists are looking at a fabric landing in the laboratory, they see some particles and give them names according to their own perception: cell fragments, antibodies, exosomes, “viruses”, globulins, laboratory artifacts etc etc etc.

Essential to remember is that ALL these so-called structures are obtained from tissue CULTURES samples and never from living tissue 

 

The problems are even more serious if we think of the destructive methods of PREPARING the tissue for. electronic microscopy ... reason for. that we cannot know WHAT are those structures analyzed by them.

Any living structure, once removed from the living body, can no longer be relevant for. Tell us something about the real processes in the living body.

Conclusions based on this type of irregular "science" are mostly hypotheses and are not applicable in biological reality.

When they keep talking about exosomes, markers, even nucleic acids (spoiler alert: neither DNA has ever been scientifically demonstrated like in the book , in reality, only theoretical concepts are being driven in the living, intact organism.

It is interesting to see in how many thousands of her works claim that "it was not possible to replicate the virus", especially in certain tissue crops

For a long time they have been trying to combine all kinds of chemical components, including toxic antibiotics, in their desperate attempts to get those fixed forms that they "sell" as viruses.

Also, in all these cases it cannot even be any isolation in the true sense, because these structures do not exist in reality 

We cannot attribute real biological functions to some particles that we examine strictly as laboratory artifacts