Dr. Ana Mihalcea - Major Chain Grocery Meat FULL of Structures Like VAXX!!! Australia & U.S.

Mikael Nordfors's picture
Submitted by Mikael Nordfors on April 15, 2023 - 11:44am
Summary: 
Dr. Ana Michalcea joins us to expose how tests on both Australian and U.S. major chain grocery store meat has shown structures like we have seen both in the COVID injection vials and the blood of the injected, now also being found in the uninjected. Dr. Ana exposes her findings in conjunction with Dr. David Nixon in Australia on this gross experiment being conducted on human beings without their consent, poisoning our food supply.
Undefined
10
Average: 10 (1 vote)
  •
  • Log in or register to post comments

Comments

Corpop

April 18, 2023 - 11:47am

Interesting but where is the science?

----

When it comes to the so called scientist and experts.
And the so called critics that keep presenting us science fiction eg. genetic engineering, cloning, neuralink, transhumanism, how the jabs have self assembly technology activated by radio-frequency.

—-
Do these people actually do much science, let alone true science?
I listened to a few of them at the start of covid , some made a bit of sense but then you soon realise it does nor correlate with what happens clinically.

—-
This link popped up, still approached from a false understanding of biology ( ie does not take into account the 5 biological laws ) but mentions what is an authentic and an imitation scientists.
From what I have listened in videos, Dr Lanka is one of the very few that uses falsification ie is trying to prove himself wrong. The rest are selling us stories as only they can do or understand the “science.”

https://www.biznews.com/health/2023/03/29/covid-crimes-2

“You can never reach the truth.
You do not know that this experiment is the final experiment.

The statements of science are not of what is true or not true but what is known with different degrees of certainty

When you hear scientists telling you with absolute certainty that this is the reality you must question them.

An authentic scientist is engaged in a lifetime expedition to uncover any evidence that challenges his or her most ‘halo ‘teaching.

If you see them on TV or media- ask yourself - Does this person ever tests his beliefs
If he does not , you do not believe them.

We have been taken over by imitation scientists who believe that science is a religion and he/she is the high priest/ priestess.

How do you identify an imitation scientist?
- They have zero interest in all the evidence
-They never read beyond what they are allowed to read -especially , in any evidence that challenges the dominant paid for doctrine , they are without doubt
- they never question, never debate,
- they say only what he/ she are allowed to say
-the media today gives you the message that only they are allowed to say it
-they are only allowed to say what you get

You cannot believe the main stream media. It is all paid for , it has a doctrine that is telling you and it is false.

Pseudoscience- they disregard any data that disagrees with them, the most important data.

The outcome in science is decided beforehand and that is paid for science.

<p>CP</p>

Corpop

April 18, 2023 - 11:53am

Interesting but where is the science?

----

When it comes to the so called scientist and experts.
And the so called critics that keep presenting us science fiction eg. genetic engineering, cloning, neuralink, transhumanism, how the jabs have self assembly technology activated by radio-frequency.

—-
Do these people actually do much science, let alone true science?
I listened to a few of them at the start of covid , some made a bit of sense but then you soon realise it does nor correlate with what happens clinically.

—-
This link popped up, still approached from a false understanding of biology ( ie does not take into account the 5 biological laws ) but mentions what is an authentic and an imitation scientists.
From what I have listened in videos, Dr Lanka is one of the very few that uses falsification ie is trying to prove himself wrong. The rest are selling us stories as only they can do or understand the “science.”

https://www.biznews.com/health/2023/03/29/covid-crimes-2

“You can never reach the truth.
You do not know that this experiment is the final experiment.

The statements of science are not of what is true or not true but what is known with different degrees of certainty

When you hear scientists telling you with absolute certainty that this is the reality you must question them.

An authentic scientist is engaged in a lifetime expedition to uncover any evidence that challenges his or her most ‘halo ‘teaching.

If you see them on TV or media- ask yourself - Does this person ever tests his beliefs
If he does not , you do not believe them.

We have been taken over by imitation scientists who believe that science is a religion and he/she is the high priest/ priestess.

How do you identify an imitation scientist?
- They have zero interest in all the evidence
-They never read beyond what they are allowed to read -especially , in any evidence that challenges the dominant paid for doctrine , they are without doubt
- they never question, never debate,
- they say only what he/ she are allowed to say
-the media today gives you the message that only they are allowed to say it
-they are only allowed to say what you get

You cannot believe the main stream media. It is all paid for , it has a doctrine that is telling you and it is false.

Pseudoscience- they disregard any data that disagrees with them, the most important data.

The outcome in science is decided beforehand and that is paid for science.

<p>CP</p>

Corpop

April 18, 2023 - 11:55am

 

 
The common thesis of heredity was refuted long ago by the same ones who previously postulated that heredity is inherited through our "genes". 
 
 
deepL translate:
 
Briefly:
in the 1930s, everyone was undecided whether heredity happens through proteins or through nucleic acids.Between 1940 - 1955, fatal misinterpretations gave rise to the idea that DNA was considered to be the substance of heredity. (Incidentally, also the new idea of "gene" viruses).
 
Through the Human Genome Project, it became clear to those involved that their ideas of a fixed blueprint of life were not accurate. worse, it was not even possible to determine the approximate length of the "hereditary substance" of humans. At least 30% of the human "genome" could not be found and represented. Thus, the missing gene sequences were calculated by means of computer programmes (as is also done with the alleged disease-causing viruses), i.e. invented and presented to the client, the taxpayer, as really existing.
 
In order to explain the diversity and complexity of the human metabolism, the gene theory requires the assumption of about 100,000 "genes". Incidentally, these were also the estimates of the geneticists before the project, because there was no other way to imagine it and it would not make sense to maintain their thesis. 
 
Only by inventing about 30% of gene data through computer programmes (see analogue of genome construction for disease-causing viruses) did those involved in the Human Genome Project manage to come up with 20,000 - 25,000 human "genes". Without inventing 30% additional genes, the rat in the rat genome project managed 25,000 - 30,000 "genes". The fluctuation of the figures "20,000 - 25,000 human genes" alone shows that those involved do not agree on what a gene should be and how it is defined.
 
Today it is known and no longer denied that no one knows what a gene actually is, how it should be defined and where its boundaries are.
 
Geneticists are not even able to produce a human protein, not even insulin, on the basis of a gene. At most, only a protein coarse template is produced.
 
The failed attempt of epigenetics is the balancing act between disproved theory (fixed blueprint DNA) and the inability to imagine life and heredity without a hereditary substance. 
 
Here it becomes clear once again how criticism that does not hit the point - see also with the virus existence claim, here there is endless discussion about PCR, masks, distances, vaccines and one goes round in circles - serves to stabilise a construct, an erroneous development. 
 
LG
NEXT LEVEL - Knowledge rethought
www.wissen-neu-geacht.de
 
 

<p>CP</p>