These latest findings do not rule out the presence of GO in the injections and it does not negate the findings of other citizen scientists who have demonstrated mass spectrometry results consistent with the presence of the compound. As Wakeling stated, “the presence of 2D crystalline structures per se are probably not signatures of graphene oxide but are signatures of something else, something more profound perhaps.”
Discussion In our random sampling of COVID19 vaccines, we have found preliminary evidences of the presence of nanoparticles of potential toxicity that are not declared in the technical data sheets of manufacturers, such as graphene oxide and heavy metals. Since they are not included in the documentation presented to the regulatory agencies in USA and EU (FDA, EMA, etc.) for the emergency authorizations obtained for urgent use in humans, HERE WE CLAIM THAT extensive, independent COUNTER-ANALYSIS MUST BE DONE to all COVID19 vaccines, including properly designed sampling of different batches throughout the period of vaccination. It is unknown whether these nanoparticles were introduced by contamination during the process of manufacturing, or they were intentionally included in the formulations. As far as we know, NO OFFICIAL COUNTER-ANALYSIS FROM REGULATORY AGENCIES has been done or published. Reviewing the process of emergency authorization, it seems that control the final product before its distribution IS ONLY BASED ON DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURERS. That means that consumers are not fully informed of the real content of the products, so that informed consent to participate in experimental drugs has not been presented to participants. Possible adverse effects, including death, notified to VAERS and other systems might be caused by the inoculation of those contaminants into the body. It must be observed that the components that are not declared but we identified are not biocompatible and some have also a mechanical impact once they are inside the blood circulation, especially in contact with the vascular endothelium, with potential thrombotic activity. The nanoparticles found in Pfizer and Astrazeneca “vaccines”, can represent a potential risk for the human body, due to their known toxicity. They can be responsible of the formation of thrombi since they are thrombogenic. A further risk is represented by the extravasation of the particles with an ensuing possible haemorrhage. Once in the blood circulation, the particles can be carried also to the brain. In this case the patient can suffer from a stroke, and/or a cerebral haemorrhage. If the damage of the endothelium caused by the particles occurs in the heart, there is a high probability of contracting a myocarditis. In addition to all that, the toxicity of graphene is well-known (Volkov et al, 2017), so its presence in batches should be carefully monitored according to our preliminary observations.
Comments
Corpop
November 16, 2022 - 7:58pm
Permalink
NANOTECHNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS ON COVID-19 VACCINES
From article:
These latest findings do not rule out the presence of GO in the injections and it does not negate the findings of other citizen scientists who have demonstrated mass spectrometry results consistent with the presence of the compound. As Wakeling stated, “the presence of 2D crystalline structures per se are probably not signatures of graphene oxide but are signatures of something else, something more profound perhaps.”
https://herowndestiny.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/INFORME-THE-SCIENTIFIC-CLUB-CORREGIDO-POR-DR.-CAMPRA.pdf
Discussion
In our random sampling of COVID19 vaccines, we have found preliminary evidences of the presence of nanoparticles of potential toxicity that are not declared in the technical data sheets of manufacturers, such as graphene oxide and heavy metals. Since they are not included in the documentation presented to the regulatory agencies in USA and EU (FDA, EMA, etc.) for the emergency authorizations obtained for urgent use in humans, HERE WE CLAIM THAT extensive, independent COUNTER-ANALYSIS MUST BE DONE to all COVID19 vaccines, including properly designed sampling of different batches throughout the period of vaccination.
It is unknown whether these nanoparticles were introduced by contamination during the process of manufacturing, or they were intentionally included in the formulations. As far as we know, NO OFFICIAL COUNTER-ANALYSIS FROM REGULATORY AGENCIES has been done or published. Reviewing the process of emergency authorization, it seems that control the final product before its distribution IS ONLY BASED ON DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURERS. That means that consumers are not fully informed of the real content of the products, so that informed consent to participate in experimental drugs has not been presented to participants. Possible adverse effects, including death, notified to VAERS and other systems might be caused by the inoculation of those contaminants into the body. It must be observed that the components that are not declared but we identified are not biocompatible and some have also a mechanical impact once they are inside the blood circulation, especially in contact with the vascular endothelium, with potential thrombotic activity. The nanoparticles found in Pfizer and Astrazeneca “vaccines”, can represent a potential risk for the human body, due to their known toxicity. They can be responsible of the formation of thrombi since they are thrombogenic. A further risk is represented by the extravasation of the particles with an ensuing possible haemorrhage. Once in the blood circulation, the particles can be carried also to the brain. In this case the patient can suffer from a stroke, and/or a cerebral haemorrhage. If the damage of the endothelium caused by the particles occurs in the heart, there is a high probability of contracting a myocarditis. In addition to all that, the toxicity of graphene is well-known (Volkov et al, 2017), so its presence in batches should be carefully monitored according to our preliminary observations.
<p>CP</p>