DNA DISCOVERY, EXTRACTION AND STRUCTURE. A CRITICAL REVIEW

Undefined
10
Average: 10 (1 vote)

“The existence of DNA, its structure and its role are taught to us as facts; recognized and approved by all scientific establishments. But what if I told you that DNA started as a concept. Not DNA itself, but scientists’ need to find the secret of life within our tissue, within the cells, and that the first DNA extraction became the perfect basis for the development of all sorts of theories, concepts, models and tools e.g. chromosomes, genes, RNA, PCR, GMO, epigenetics, CRISPR etc.

Currently DNA is presented to us as a double helix chain structure which carries our genetic code and instructions for the development, functioning and growth of all living organisms. But how exactly was all this established? This article will cover the history of DNA, which will include DNA isolation, isolation of its components, structure and many critical thoughts and questions that occurred during the literature review.”

 

DNA Discovery, Extraction & Structure: A Critical Review

▪️"The 2-chain helical structure is suggested & assumed based on missing spots in the x-ray diffraction pattern of the hydrated form of NaDNA (B-DNA), mathematical models & invisible base pairs.

These suggestions were not confirmed by examining DNA extracted from other sources.

▪️Existence of base pairs & their composition are assumed based on presumed molecular structure of DNA.

▪️The use of X-ray damages the structure of any tissue & its content, the diffraction pattern of NaDNA might be a diffraction of a damaged NaDNA."

read:

 

https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/

related1:

https://telegra.ph/Genetics-Genome-in-Dissolution-11-01

 

PCR & DNA:

related2:

https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2022/05/08/pcr-and-real-time-rt-pcr-under-critical-review/

 

related3:Cowan:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/9Y3Bo07cfJdJ/

 

(see comments for more)

T:https://t.me/JavRoJav/199

Comments

 A comment

“ “Peer reviewed research” or “evidence based medicine” are meaningless terms now. The “research” that is published is mostly that which is favorable to industry because the majority of funding comes from industry. Over 90% of published “science” cannot be replicated (according to a recent analysis).

 

The reality is that doctors and “scientists” do not have good information because they have been conditioned to trust in a system that is patently corrupt. The Rockefeller indoctrination machine has convinced the world to believe in the new religion of scientism, which is worlds apart from actual scientific truth seeking. Scientism, with all of its dogma and ritual, has become a weapon of control and psychological manipulation."

<p>CP</p>