Baileys vs Spacebusters

The Drs Bailey take on the hilarious Steve Falconer - the man behind Spacebusters.
We discuss:

  • Medical school vs reality
  • Keys to real health
  • What bioweapons actually are
  • The end of germ theory
  • What causes disease
...and much more!
0
No votes yet

Comments

An interesting addition on bacteria

“ In the words of Dr. Stefan Lanka on bacteria experimentation:

“Bacteria will produce toxins but only in a dead body. They survive in an aerobic environment such as the intestinal tract which when the individual or animal dies is deprived of oxygen. However only a few will survive but only if they can manage to change their metabolism and only then do they become toxic.

FACT: bacteria are not identifiable in a test tube. Only 2% of all bacteria are able to be cultivated and multiply. If a bacteria is extracted and cultivated in isolation it loses its properties after a short time and won’t survive so to work with them, large quantities are frozen which constitutes a massive intervention and doesn’t represent their behavior in nature.

During experimentation it was observed that the bacteria, even though some multiplied that they were unable to produce toxins in a living host. They only produced toxins in a dead host.

Then an attempt was made to inject the bacteria into a different host but they failed to make it sick. The only success they had in killing the host was when they injected these cadaver toxins into live mice. After that they took an organ from the dead mouse and transplanted it into a living host which then also dies.

The fact is that these living creatures die more so from the experimental process than the toxins from the bacteria that they were injected with.”

 

Dr. Lanka on the isolation of a virus:


“Samples are taken from the “infected” person or animal and are placed with a “cell type” that the virus is being tested for which is usually foreign genetic material and is artificially introduced into the cell. This is called transfection. If the cells show changes known as cytopathic effects meaning structural changes in the host cell then the culture is deemed as “positive for a virus”.
Most current testing is done on chicken eggs containing chicken embryos, which is the same method Robert Koch used to inject cadaver toxins into live creatures. In this case they take samples from the “affected” person or animal and inject it into the chicken egg and depending on how the embryo dies it is proclaimed that the virus is found.
Then it is claimed that the virus has been isolated. The problem is that there is never a control group so even if a sterile solution is injected into the egg it will also die.
The current photographs of viruses found in medical books or online are all either CGI (computer generated images) or only a mixture of fats and proteins which are then shaken in an ultrasound bath and then visualized under a microscope. However it is observed that they have no nucleic acid and decompose quickly. Also they are of different sizes. Clearly this is fraud.

““It’s unlikely there will be a miracle drug,” she said. “But Canada has had some incredible successes creating vaccines very quickly. We had huge success with the Ebola virus.”

Now that is interesting about “virus like particles” so that means they are in fact admitting that they have NEVER actually isolated a LIVE virus…..not to mention the success with the Ebola virus…especially since it was discovered in the very beginning some years ago that the water sources in the affected villages had been poisoned with formaldehyde. 

If you look at the Ebola symptoms you will see that they are the same as formaldehyde poisoning.”

 Source:

https://www.gnmonlineseminars.com/covid-19-part-iii-a-little-science/

And a comment

"It is more than obvious that 99.(9)% of so-called microbiological scientists do not understand anything about what they see under the optical microscope, which is why they do not understand why only about 2% of all bacteria are able to be cultivated and multiply, because they don’t understand why if a bacterium is extracted and cultivated in isolation it loses its properties after a short time and won’t survive. So-called microbiologists will not even understand anything correctly about what they see under the optical microscope as long as their heads are full of preconceived ideas about what exactly the structures they see are.

It is enough to study about the pleomorphic cycle of microorganisms to understand that bacteria cannot be cultivated because they are formed from the microzymes of animal or plant tissue that is in the process of decomposition.

In the context revealed by the pleomorphic cycle of microorganisms, consider that in the so-called process of culturing bacteria, so-called microbiologists harvest bacteria from animal tissues that are in different stages of decay and transfer them to culture media that are different radically by the animal tissues from which the bacteria were harvested.

So if the medium from which the bacteria are harvested is not the same as the medium on which the bacteria are grown, it is natural that almost all the bacteria that are extracted for cultivation will lose their properties and disappear, and it is natural that only a small percentage of bacteria to be found on the so-called culture medium, which is very different from the medium from which the bacteria were extracted."

<p>CP</p>