“Monkeypox”

Some have even gone so far as to claim that in some cases COVID-19 would manifest itself exclusively through skin symptoms. Itchy wheals, oozing blisters, spots, swelling, open sores, pustules, etc.. All according to studies also contained in COVID-19.

 

-> Anyone who knows how the definition of COVID-19 came about also knows that you can't put anything past such studies. Whoever got a positive corona test, their symptoms were documented and thus ended up in the official clinical picture. Basically, it didn't matter what the symptoms were. Accordingly, the COVID 19 symptom catalogue grew steadily until COVID could finally be everything and nothing at all, thus becoming the most ridiculous disease definition in the history of orthodox medicine.

 

In monkeypox, too, the skin changes according to the definition are manifold. It starts, as so often, with fever, chills, etc. and when the first skin symptoms appear after a few days (often on the face), "pockmarked exanthema" is said to form first, which again can be and by definition is anything - spots, fluid-filled vesicles, pus-filled vesicles, etc.

 

Fine apparent differences in symptoms, usually defined in minute details, which are often used as an argument to claim that the unspecific symptom complexes of certain disease definitions can certainly be distinguished from each other and are not comparable at all, are medically, scientifically untenable, not to say eyewash. In our article on the disease definition of COVID-19, we have already shown the curious way in which attempts have been made since 2020 to present COVID-19 as an independent disease that could be "clearly" distinguished from the common cold or influenza.

 

After the first skin changes have appeared, they are supposed to gradually develop on other parts of the body as well. On the limbs, in the genital area, on the abdomen, etc. All this is also included in the international definition of COVID-19.

 

-> And not only in it. Nowadays, such skin changes are often diagnosed as scabies, even if there is no evidence for the presence of mites. In the first one and a half years of the Corona crisis, there are said to have been quite a number of cases of scabies in Germany, which in many cases is probably only due to the fact that the people in question simply did not test positive.

 

Symptoms without a positive PCR test = scabies (or neurodermatitis); identical symptoms with a positive PCR test = COVID.

 

 

 

 

There are several ways to get rid of the old narrative or to combine it with the new. If one wants to make Corona disappear, one could do the following:

 

1.) one claims that the virus has finally mutated into a harmless variant (as was the case with swine flu) and disappeared on its own - even though the current German health minister and expert on everything strictly rejects such a possibility.

 

2) they claim that the current Corona variant is quite harmless, but that the virus is far from gone, so that the old narrative can be reheated at the end of 2022 or even in a year or two -> at the moment it looks as if they will try it that way

 

3) a new super-vaccine is brought onto the market that is supposed to be really effective this time. Then a lower vaccination rate would suddenly do the trick, and the virus could ultimately be successfully combated after all. This possibility is conceivable, but it is questionable whether it would be possible to vaccinate another vaccine en masse. Perhaps there will just be an antiviral super-drug on the market that can combat COVID-19 highly successfully and make vaccinations superfluous.

 

And 4) Corona is simply silenced from one day to the next and the focus is only on the new narrative.

 

In principle, however, one could also combine the old narrative with the new one, just as one tried to do with the flu in early 2022. In other words, one would try to drive on two tracks and maintain both narratives in parallel. In doing so, one could either continue both alleged diseases separately - if it looks too much like respiratory problems, it is corona, if it affects the skin too much, it is monkeypox - or one tries again with a "twindemic" claim, which could then again lead to funny neologisms such as "monkeypoxona" or "coropox".

 

 

Theoretically, there would be one aspect that could give a huge boost to the potential new narrative of monkeypox and lead to many people being convinced of its reality and dangerousness.

 

One of the many possible health after-effects of the corona hysteria would be an increased incidence of various skin disorders in the population. As mentioned before, already in the midst of the Corona crisis, among many other ("unusual") complaints, an increased occurrence of troublesome skin complaints (among others, also among us in the team) became apparent. According to the system of New Medicine/Universal Biology, the cause of these skin changes lies primarily in the (intentional or unintentional) severance of contact with other people, primarily caused by the lockdown and the nonsensical AHA rules, and thus has psychosomatic reasons.

 

The symptoms do not occur during the psychological stress ("I'm not allowed to see grandma any more..."), but afterwards, when one is mentally detached again and physically relaxes ("I'm finally allowed to see grandma again!"). Incidentally, this is also the reason for the typical holiday cold. Once you are finally away from the unfair boss, the annoying work colleagues or the project that bores and stresses you so much, and now see yourself lying on the beach in the sun for a full two weeks, your body goes into relaxation. The stress falls off you and the body begins to return the functions that were previously throttled back or running at full throttle to normal. This causes the typical symptoms of illness, which is why you lie sick in bed for the first few days of your holiday in the hotel. Once you are back from holiday and back at work, you feel the strain again and your body (unnoticed by you) changes certain functions again, which starts the whole thing all over again.

 

Such a significantly more frequent occurrence of skin complaints after the corona hysteria would therefore still be theoretically possible, but in practice it is now rather unlikely. Many people have hardly been interested in the required distance since summer 2021, or they had already become so accustomed to the distance to other people that this no longer represented a psychological burden for them. And also with the Corona vaccinations, it became apparent that a very large part of the population did not get vaccinated at all out of conviction or fear of Corona, but rather out of convenience, conformity, laziness, fear of reprisals or, in all seriousness, for a free bratwurst (what a cliché!). Therefore, there may not even be more cases of skin lesions than those that have already occurred during Corona.

 

But one cannot look into people's heads and therefore cannot say how many may still have psychological stresses active as a result of the Corona hysteria. Stresses that, once resolved, would lead to visible and sometimes severe physical reactions that could then be presented as monkeypox. A renewed, mass generation of psychological stresses with the help of a new narrative and new scaremongering would also be conceivable in principle, but it remains to be seen whether the broad masses would really participate consistently in this again so soon after Corona.

 

However, all this is just speculation and theoretical considerations. If there is indeed an increased occurrence of skin complaints in the next 12 months, we will write a separate article and explain in detail how these phenomena come about. In any case, they have nothing to do with viruses, that much we can already say.