Reconciling differences pertaining to the origin of SARS-CoV-2

Undefined
0
No votes yet

Abstract

Background

At the time of this writing, SARS-CoV-2 has reportedly claimed the lives of millions of people worldwide. However, there is still disagreement concerning the origin of SARS-CoV-2, its true nature, and the extent of its pathogenicity. Thus, the purpose of this manuscript is to highlight and critically analyze these differences so that research efforts can be geared toward addressing these concerns.

Main Body

For this purpose, the author studied the perspectives of both conventional and non-conventional scientists, physicians, and researchers in an attempt to understand the points of contention and the reasons for the vast gulf in perspective.

Conclusion

After reviewing the varying but divergent perspective pertaining to the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and the premises used to justify them, it has become clear that if the scientific community is to put a halt to the spread of misinformation pertaining to the origin of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, the predominant scientific community (particularly the microbiologist/immunologist) must carry out the requisite scientific procedures and encourage governmental/academic transparency.

https://bnrc.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42269-022-00712-4

Comments

USA (Department of Biological Sciences) - Does SARS-CoV-2 exist or has it never been detected !?

 

In a detailed peer-reviewed meta-analysis on the current state of knowledge of SARS-CoV-2, lead author Yasin Ali Muhammad of the Department of Biological Sciences, explores the question of whether SARS-CoV-2 exists at all. 

 

This study trumps big names in the field of virology, both on the virus-believing side and the now many well-known critics such as Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and Dr. Tom Cowan, etc.

 

Three theories are analysed 

 

1️⃣ SARS-CoV-2 of natural origin?

 

2️⃣ SARS-CoV-2 an origin from the laboratory?

 

3️⃣ SARS-CoV-2 does not exist and has never been detected.

 

Conclusion of the study!

 

There is insufficient evidence either for the claim of a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, or for its emergence in a laboratory, even after 2 years. The strongest evidence is on the side of those who pointed out that there is no SARS-CoV-2!

 

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

deepL translate:

 

https://t.me/Corona_Fakten/1039

<p>CP</p>