Corona: The comprehensible and verifiable refutation of the virus allegations

No votes yet



  1. The genetic strand of SARS-CoV-2 is only one model, which was created by an alignment. In the publication of Fan Wu et al, in Nature, Vol 579 of 3.2.2020 (16), in which the genome (complete genetic strand) of SARS-CoV-2 was presented for the first time, it became the template for all further alignments of all other virologists and biochemists.
  2. The genome (genetic strand) of SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated, only the entire RNA obtained from a bronchial lavage (BALF) of a patient has been used.
  3. No control experiments were performed to exclude that the gene sequences are tissue-own structures. Examples of this can be found in the following article: . Epidemic authority confirmed: Neither virus-existence research nor control experiments performed read . These questions make every virologist nervous read . The Federal Court of Justice destroys the belief in Viruses read
  4. Virology had already given up in 1951, after those responsible had carried out the necessary control experiments (17).
  5. All genetic ideas were completely and comprehensively refuted in 2000, the year of the publication of the contradictory data of the so-called Human Genome Project, the embarrassing claim that the entire human genome had been read although more than half had to be invented (18).
  6. The cytopathic effect is NOT! Virus specific! *(see expert opinion 3- cytopathic effect in monkey kidney cells is not maservirus-specific)
  7. The rules that have been bindingly codified for scientific work (lege artis) by the German Research Foundation (DFG) since 1998 and signed by all university rectors have not been and are still not complied with.
  8. Many doctors and scientists are subject to the same error. They do not realize that the basis of these publications already did not provide proof and that the necessary control experiments were missing.  
  9. Louis Pasteur, who massively propagated the virus theory, was convicted of science fraud (19)."