INSERT – The “virus mutation”- Projekt Immanuel

Average: 10 (1 vote)

The mutant from Great Britain and others will overrun us, the virus got a rocket engine.
We never get enough people vaccinated before the mutants hit
This race is long lost.
Corona will still keep us busy in 2022 – probably beyond.
Quotes from Spiegel Online (science) – “Virologist Brinkmann warns of corona easing -” The race is long lost. It will come like in England «“, an interview by Jürgen Dahlkamp and Rafaela von Bredow – 05.02.2021
Almost everyone in Germany probably knows these quotes by now. They come from another so-called “Corona expert” – how many are there actually? – which is referred to as one of the “voices of science”. The statements of this “expert”, a virologist, were not only diligently disseminated through many media channels, but were also often (rightly) criticized.

We don’t want to talk about the media and media representatives here, but what scientists in particular expect from it when they spread such wild horror forecasts is really a mystery to us. But no matter what your intentions, such scare tactics are not helpful! Especially not if it has no factual basis.

We do not assume that the virologist quoted above has any bad intentions! On the contrary, we assume that she has a firm belief in what she says and that she is convinced that she is doing the right thing. We therefore distance ourselves from all the wild abuse and accusations that are being showered on you and other scientists who support government measures or who call for even tougher measures. What we sharply criticize this virologist and many other scientists for is that they behave dubiously and irresponsibly with such statements! Spreading fear and panic never makes sense! People who are even remotely related to medicine should know best.

What kind of mutations should there be in SARS-CoV-2?

Claims that the notorious SARS-CoV-2 is supposed to have mutated further have been haunted by the media since December 2020.

The best-known alleged mutants, which are said to have emerged from SARS-CoV-2 and with which fear in the population is again unrestrained, are:

“CLUSTER 5” from Denmark
B.1.351, 501Y.V2 from South Africa
B.1.1.28 P.1, 501Y.V.3 from Brazil
and of course B.1.1.7, 501Y.V1 from Great Britain, which served as a justification for even tougher, more devastating measures and probably led to the development of the nonsensical “#ZeroCovid” campaign.

According to the “experts”, these mutants should primarily lead to easier transferability of COVID-19. By mutating the so-called spike proteins, the alleged new coronaviruses should be able to dock onto the cells more easily and infiltrate them. The best known examples of these alleged mutations of the spike proteins are D614G and N501Y.

How does the idea of ​​virus mutation come about?

Contrary to what is actually intended in science, the existence of pathogens is not factually proven in virology. Instead, their existence is only considered proven on the basis of interpreted visual appearance and conceptual models. Pathogenic viruses are initially nothing more than mere consensus, that is, an opinion that has been agreed upon in science.
You can find out more about virus evidence in the main program of Project Immanuel.

The “SARS-CoV-2” virus itself is said to be a mutation of old coronavirus strains. This assumption arose through the so-called “sequence alignment”, which is considered to be one of the hardest scientific evidence for the existence of SARS-CoV-2. Sequence alignment (or alignment for short) is a bioinformatics process in which fragments of nucleic acid (DNA) are put together on the computer to form a hypothetical strand of genetic material. In order to be able to carry out the alignment, which is roughly comparable to a puzzle, you need templates in the form of old genetic material strands. Just like the picture on the box of the puzzle serves as a template. With SARS-CoV-2, two old corona models were used for this.
Because, in the process of alignment, large parts of the constructed genetic strand are basically invented and other parts are “bent” by the appropriate computer programs so that a reasonably credible result arises, the finished construct never looks 100% like the template in the end. As if trying to force pieces of the puzzle that do not belong to the template together to form a similar picture.

=> This (inevitable) deviation from the template is ultimately everything on which the whole idea of ​​the “mutation” called SARS-CoV-2 is based!

And how do you get the idea that SARS-CoV-2 should continue to mutate?

The genetic strand of SARS-CoV-2 is largely fictitious, but the basis for it consists of parts of nucleic acid that occur in the metabolism of every organism (which is one reason why every person, every animal and every plant is considered to be “positive “Could test for Corona). To use the example of the puzzle again: you have a few real puzzle pieces that have nothing to do with the template, and you simply put together all the remaining pieces by cutting out suitable pieces of cardboard and painting them according to the template.

The fact is that we have known for over twenty years that nucleic acids are constantly changing. Therefore, nucleic acid cannot possibly contain our genetic material! Ideas like epigenetics (flexible inheritance) are just desperate attempts to somehow justify the previous idea of ​​material inheritance in the form of genes and to keep them alive.
Nowadays some scientists assume that the DNA serves to create and release energy in the body, which explains the constant changes in the DNA. The majority of scientists, however, still start from the outdated idea of ​​genes (without ever questioning or checking them) and believe that the blueprint of a living being is stored in the DNA. Hence, in the fact that DNA changes, they see a “mutation” of genes.

If you examine DNA fragments that were obtained from humans or animals and incorrectly represented the basis of the hypothetical genetic strand of SARS-CoV-2, and you discover that the DNA has changed, the idea arises that SARS-CoV -2 would be mutated.

=> the idea of ​​the mutations of SARS-CoV-2 is based only on the interpretation of the fact that every DNA is constantly changing. Or, to put it more generally, the idea of ​​virus mutation only arises because one is still working with completely outdated, long-disproved scientific hypotheses.

In this way and with this outdated idea, new mutations of SARS-CoV-2 (er) can be found forever. This can quickly become a catastrophic surefire success and a vicious circle. And it looks like a lot of scientists have already gotten into this.

Google translate-