Final plea regarding Case HSAN 24.1-34243 / 2019/Dr. Mikael Nordfors

The Swedish Health and Care Inspectorate (IVO) wants to inform that it has come to the authority's knowledge that Mikael Nordfors states in a Youtube clip that there are drugs and treatment for Covid-19. Here is the clip from 29/3 2020:

Mikael Nordfors also states in the Youtube clip that if he had a Covid-19 clinic, he would treat patients with a high dose of vitamin C, vitamin D, zinc, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.

IVO states that the treatments on the indication Covid-19 that Mikael Nordfors suggested in the Youtube clip are not approved for this indication. Furthermore, the treatments that Mikael Nordfors refers to are treatments where doctors prescribe drugs for an indication that the drug is not approved for treatment or where clinical studies are in progress. IVO thus considers that the statements made by Mikael Nordfors are not in accordance with science and proven experience.

Opinion in HSAN's case with no. 24.1-34243 / 2019

In the Youtube clip, Mikael Nordfors refers to China and says that there is information that the combination of Plaquenil (hydroxychloroquine) and Azithromycin (antibiotics) had a good effect against Covid-19. According to Mikael Nordfors, there is also information that a doctor in New York successfully treated patients with Plaquenil and Azithromycin. The prescription has been 500-600 mg of Plaquenil daily and a standard dose of Azithromycin.

Furthermore, Mikael Nordfors states that there is support that treatment with vitamin C intravenously and hydrogen inhalation in combination with oxygen has a good effect against Covid-19. According to him, iShanghai has been given 10-20 grams of vitamin C per day, which has given good results without serious side effects and none of the treating patients have died. Mikael Nordfors also refers to Dr. Klinghardt and treatment with antioxidant products such as certain herbs and states that these products and treatment with vitamin C and vitamin D can protect against Covid-19.

IVO considers that Mikael Nordfors' statements are clearly inappropriate and not compatible with his identification as a doctor. Otherwise maintains

The Swedish Health and Care Inspectorate 2020-05-11 Dnr 8.6.1-25087 / 2018-43 1 (2)

Health and Care Inspectorate Telephone 010-788 50 00 Fax 010-788 56 59

The Health and Medical Care Responsibility Committee, HSAN National Board of Health and Welfare
106 30 STOCKHOLM

Box 53148 registrator.sydvast ivo.se Org nr 202100-6537 400 15 Göteborg www.ivo.se

IVO has also complained about Mikael Nordfors' record keeping and that he performed ozone treatment etc.

Dr. Nordfors Advokat Björn Gärde has stated the following:

The Health Care Liability Committee, HSAN

The National Board of Health and Welfare
106 30 STOCKHOLM

BY POST AND E-MAIL hsan@socialstyrelsen.se

Case HSAN 24.1-34243 / 2019

Health and Care Inspectorate "IVO"

./. Dr. Mikael Nordfors

Dr. Mikael Nordfors has received HSAN's decision, of 23 June 2021, not to grant the requested oral hearing and that Dr. Mikael Nordfors, latest
on August 4, 2021, shall complete its action.

To Dr. Mikael Nordfors' account of his opinion, what is to be tried by HSAN, by

on 8 July 2021, HSAN has stated that what is to be examined is "the circumstances IVO states in its notification".

IVO’s application, dated 11 November 2019, states that Dr. Mikael Nordfors wanted confirmed by HSAN, by letter of 8 July 2021, namely that;

(i) the case concerns 11 patient cases.

(ii) Dr. Mikael Nordfors has not investigated these

11 patients' symptoms and also not considered alternative diagnoses.

(iii) Dr. Mikael Nordfors has subsequently treated these 11 patients with ozone, of which only one took place intravenously.

(iv) Dr. Mikael Nordfors did not follow up these 11 patients after the treatments.

(v) Dr. Mikael Nordfors' record keeping, regarding these 11 patients, is so deficient that it is not possible to follow the care.

(vi) Furthermore, Dr. Mikael Nordfors, prescription, on off label indication, with low doses of antabus, Naltrexone and Gabapentin to a patient and the sale of medical technical equipment to the patient for his own treatment of ozone, locally over tissue-dead wounds.

A. Science and proven experience

A.1.1 Dr. Mikael Nordfors believes that the ozone treatments in question in the case constitute science and proven experience.

A.2 The basic regulation for the professional practice of doctors is the legal obligation to provide the patient with the advice and, as far as possible, the treatment required by the patient's condition in accordance with science and proven experience. What constitutes science and proven experience changes in step with the development of research, new treatment strategies, etc.

The Social Affairs Committee has stated early on, i.a. in SoU 1973: 27, that “within the framework (for science and proven experience) the doctor has the freedom to apply the medical methods he deems most adequate. What constitutes science and proven experience is ultimately formulated by the medical service's responsible committee and the general courts… "

B. IVO's claim cannot be legally upheld

B.1 In the case, IVO does not rely on any evidence but only makes unsubstantiated allegations.

B.2 As appears from the investigation from the investigation service at the Swedish Parliament, by the

January 10, 2002, page 1, appendix 1, appears among other things;

"The National Board of Health and Welfare's view of the matter" (what constitutes science and proven experience) "can be given great value, but it has no legally winding effect".

B.3 As established by the higher instances, it is IVO that has the full burden of proof for its claims.

B.4 Thus, in the case word for word, IVO has not succeeded in proving its claims as to why IVO's action, already on this ground, cannot be upheld.

C. Requirements for unified medical science

C.1 In the event that HSAN considers that IVO relied on evidence, for its claims, which evidence Dr. In that case, Mikael Nordfors wishes to receive the opportunity to respond, the following applies;

The Administrative Court in Stockholm has, in case 48457-10, stated:

"With regard to the evidentiary requirements in cases of the present type, the Supreme Administrative Court (now the Supreme Administrative Court) has stated that, in order for a disciplinary sanction to be imposed on anyone, it is in principle required that full evidence is available in the sense that the facts assessment must be substantiated. There is thus an increased requirement for the evidence. "

The Court of Appeal determines, in its judgment, of it

4 January 2005 in case no. 6140-02:

"In order for a disciplinary sanction to be imposed on him, it is required according to practice that there is a consensus among medical experts that there has been a departure from science and proven experience."

Dr. Mikael Nordfors also refers to the Court of Appeal's judgment 1994-12-16, case no.

12062-1993. As also appears from this judgment, page 3 para. 4, such consensus is required for a care provider who has used a certain method to be considered to have acted negligently. This requirement for consensus also appears in the Court of Appeal in Stockholm's judgment no. 6140 from 2002.

The Court of Appeal in Stockholm has in case no. 12062-1993 stated that:

"However, as far as has emerged, no dominant consensus internationally seems to exist"

Medical science, Swedish and international, must agree that working methods, tests and diagnoses are grossly incorrect. It must be shown that the doctor is grossly incompetent. If the different sciences are opposed to each other, no revocation of his identity card should take place.

D Specialist doctors' certificate that the ozone treatments in question constitute science and proven experience

D.1 Dr. Mikael Nordfors has contacted

specialists in the matter and will submit their expert opinions as soon as he receives them.

Oral information received means that the ozone treatments constitute science and proven experience.

t great value but it has no legally winding effect ”.

B.3 As established by the higher instances, it is IVO that has the full burden of proof for its claims.

B.4 Thus, in the case word for word, IVO has not succeeded in proving its claims as to why IVO's action, already on this ground, cannot be upheld.

C. Requirements for unified medical science

C.1 In the event that HSAN considers that IVO relied on evidence, for its claims, which evidence Dr. In that case, Mikael Nordfors wishes to receive the opportunity to respond, the following applies;

The Administrative Court in Stockholm has, in case 48457-10, stated:

"With regard to the evidentiary requirements in cases of the present type, the Supreme Administrative Court (now the Supreme Administrative Court) has stated that, in order for a disciplinary sanction to be imposed on anyone, it is in principle required that full evidence is available in the sense that the facts assessment must be substantiated. There is thus an increased requirement for the evidence. "

The Court of Appeal determines, in its judgment, of it

4 January 2005 in case no. 6140-02:

"In order for a disciplinary sanction to be imposed on him, it is required according to practice that there is a consensus among medical experts that there has been a departure from science and proven experience."

Dr. Mikael Nordfors also refers to the Court of Appeal's judgment 1994-12-16, case no.

12062-1993. As also appears from this judgment, page 3 para. 4, such consensus is required for a care provider who has used a certain method to be considered to have acted negligently. This requirement for consensus also appears in the Court of Appeal in Stockholm's judgment no. 6140 from 2002.

The Court of Appeal in Stockholm has in case no. 12062-1993 stated that:

"However, as far as has emerged, no dominant consensus internationally seems to exist"

Medical science, Swedish and international, must agree that working methods, tests and diagnoses are grossly incorrect. It must be shown that the doctor is grossly incompetent. If the different sciences are opposed to each other, no revocation of his identity card should take place.

D Specialist doctors' certificate that the ozone treatments in question constitute science and proven experience

D.1 Dr. Mikael Nordfors has contacted

specialists in the matter and will submit their expert opinions as soon as he receives them.

Oral information received means that the ozone treatments constitute science and proven experience and that they do not constitute a danger to patient safety.

D.2 The following judgments thus become relevant.

By judgment from the Administrative Court of Appeal in Sundsvall, on

August 27, 2008, in case no. 2640-07, it appears that the words of expert doctors weigh heavier than those of doctors without specialist competence and that the words of two doctors weigh heavier than those of a doctor, an insurance doctor.

The Court of Appeal in Sundsvall has in case no. 2192-07, of 12 March 2008, also stated that "the words of an expert doctor outweigh those of an insurance doctor".

The Court of Appeal in Gothenburg also states that doctors with relevant specialist knowledge words outweigh the views of other doctors and a disagreement within the medical profession as a whole.

E. Summary

E.1 IVO has not substantiated, or sought substantiation, its claims.

Thus, Dr. Mikael Nordfors' doctor's ID card is revoked.

E.2 Instead, Dr. Mikael Nordfors proved, which he did not have to, that the ozone treatments constitute science and proven experience and are also harmless.

Even on this basis, Dr. Mikael Nordfors' doctor's ID card will not be revoked.

__________________

Nacka on August 2, 2021

Björn Gärde

Here are video-recorded testimonies from Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Vice President of Pfizer and Head of Research at their Department of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases 

 
Professor Euhenij Nazarov, world-leading expert in ozone therapy and chairman of the International Association of Medical Gas Therapists and chairman of the Ukrainian Association for Ozone Therapy,
 
 
The consultant in general medicine, Dr. Hanna Åsberg has stated the following:
 

 

 

In addition, Dr. Merly Nass, US Government Adviser and Specialist in Internal Medicine from the United States, emailed the following:
"My name is Dr. Meryl Nass. I am a board-certified internal medicine physician with a private practice in Ellsworth Maine. I have a bachelors degree from MIT and a medical degree and residency from the University of Mississippi. I have published over 30 medical articles and have testified before six congressional committees. While COVID-19 is a new viral illness, hundreds of studies have been done looking at re-purposed medication for its treatment. Over 200 studies have been done on hydroxychloroquine and the bulk of them show the drug to be highly beneficial at reducing hospitalization and mortality when given early to outpatients. The drug works against viral replication. It has almost no efficacy when given Late, after viral replication has ceased and the illness has developed into an auto immune phenomenon with cytokine storm and widespread coagulation Is it thought that azithromycin or doxycycline in conjunction with hydroxychloroquine may provide some additional benefit. elieved that zinc and vitamin D also provide additional benefit, and that inadequate vitamin D levels predisposed to severe covid illness. The treatment recommended by Dr. Nordfors Has been shown to be for superior to the treatment advised by establishment medical authorities, which is no treatment whatsoever until hospitalization is required.
Meryl Nass, MD

References:

Ozonbehandling, för bra för att vara sant, Mikael Nordfors 2019

Disulfiram (Tetraethylthiuram Disulfide) in the Treatment of Lyme Disease and Babesiosis: Report of Experience in Three Cases

Repurposing Disulfiram in the Treatment of Lyme Disease and Babesiosis: Retrospective Review of First 3 Years’ Experience in One Medical Practice

HCQ is effective for COVID-19 when used early: analysis of 132 studies

The Official Chinese Government Guide to Diagnosing and Treating the Novel Coronavirus.

The Long History of Vitamin C: From Prevention of the Common Cold to Potential Aid in the Treatment of COVID-19

MATH+ Hospital Treatment Protocol for COVID-19

Treatment Protocol against Covid 19 from www.ippocrateorg.org

20-Week Study of Clinical Outcomes of Over-the-Counter COVID-19 Prophylaxis and Treatment

 I-MASK+ Prevention & Early Outpatient Treatment Protocol for COVID-19

Vitamin D and COVID 19: The Evidence for Prevention and Treatment of Coronavirus (SARS CoV 2)

Hydrogen/oxygen mixed gas inhalation improves disease severity and dyspnea in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 in a recent multicenter, open-label clinical trial

Hydrogen: A Potential New Adjuvant Therapy for COVID-19 Patients 

 

Priority: 
0
No votes yet

Peoples Court Case Type: