COVID-19/SARS-CoV2: An Exploration

File attachments: 
PDF icon CV19-SARS-CoV2-An-Exploration.pdf1.98 MB
Average: 10 (1 vote)


In response to the remarkable times we are living in, we have created this shareable, downloadable, interactive PDF Exploration document ( also found on-line HERE ), a gathering of our extensive research into the covid pandemic and its effects on us all. We hope that it will enable and inspire you to research further if you choose to.
We respect and appreciate that some of what you read and explore may challenge views you hold to be true at the moment, but we believe there are significant questions that need asking about the Covid19 narrative as it is. We all wish to make choices that will enable a full and healthy life for ourselves, our communities and our children, and that are right for now and for the future. THANK YOU"

COVID-19/SARS-CoV2: An Exploration

How we act now will build the future for our children

An urgent invitation:

  • To question all that is happening

    before the chance is lost

  • To explore broader science, views and statistics

To research further
A compilation of links

to resources that will: Help you to navigate

the current situation

  • Help you to make informed decisions

  • Promote open debate and explore different views

  • Offer a starting point for further research

  • Introduce just the tip of
    the iceberg of the wealth
    of knowledge we can explore


June 2021

Photo by Monica Gozalo on

COVID-19/SARS-CoV2: An Exploration

PLEASE NOTE: Any text you see coloured orange with an underline throughout this document, will be clickable live links to internal Sections or Pages within this document, or go to external reference websites.


In response to the remarkable times we are living in, we have created this shareable, downloadable, interactive PDF Exploration document ( also found on-line HERE ), a gathering of our extensive research into the covid pandemic and its effects on us all. We hope that it will enable and inspire you to research further if you choose to.

We respect and appreciate that some of what you read and explore may challenge views you hold to be true at the moment, but we believe there are significant questions that need asking about the Covid19 narrative as it is. We all wish to make choices that will enable a full and healthy life for ourselves, our communities and our children, and that are right for now and for the future. THANK YOU.

An offering from three members of our wonderful, rich, intelligent, beautiful, precious Human tribe. Peace to us all, may we flourish into a future filled with truth, respect and light.




The information we have gathered here is by no means all that is available. COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation. The information might have changed, some links may no longer be available, but it is all accurate, thoroughly researched information at the point of publication. Also, this information is not being presented as the only truth but rather as an attempt at a broad exploration of what is happening, inspired by a strong sense that the Government mainstream narrative is not providing us with the most accurate and honest picture it can. Date Compiled: February – May 2021.

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 2






    Selection of important and often surprising information on UK Government website.

  2. 02:  MEDICAL, SCIENTIFIC AND LEGAL COMMUNITIES 06 Exploring Covid 19, the Government response and it’s effect on society.

  3. 03:  FUNDAMENTALPARADIGMS 08 Underlying our assumptions about viruses, health, the microbiome & role of natural immunity.

  4. 04:  DATA 10 Statistics, predictions, PCR tests, Asymptomatic spread, Covid death numbers, NHS occupancy.

  5. 05:  MEDIA INFORMATION CAMPAIGN 22 Psychological impact of Government communication style, information vs coercion,

    Government and media contracts.

  6. 06:  MEASURESANDINTERVENTIONS 24 Covid Vaccines, Vaccine industry, Mandates, Passports, Mask wearing, Isolation,

    Lockdowns, social distancing, school and business closures, Mass testing.

  7. 07:  POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS 49 Policy response, Preventions and treatments of Covid 19.

  8. 08:  MAKING SENSE OF WHAT IS HAPPENING 51 Economical profits, conflicts of interest, Censorship, ‘Fact checking’, global politics & control.


  10. 10:  WHAT IS THE FUTURE I WANT? 64

    The power of conscious awareness.

  11. 11:  WHAT CAN I DO? 66 Links for further research, take action, share, unite.



    Exploring fundamental paradigms that lead to particular global actions.

    SUMMARY 78 INDEX 79/80

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 3



1 UK Government information


Although we are being told clearly by the Government that Covid 19 is dangerous, that vaccines are necessary and safe and that social distancing must continue, a closer look at the Governments own website will reveal a different picture. It is essential that we all do our own research, not just accept the information we are being given without checking it: even a search of the Gov website will raise many questions as to the media message around Covid 19.

Status of COVID-19 - UK government website: This information alone invites a whole load of questions: “As of 19 March 2020 the public health bodies in the UK and the Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) no longer consider COVID-19 to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK.”

Office for National Statistics (ONS) website : *death rates per year in the UK 1990 to December 2020. A table showing that the Age Standardised Mortality rates (the true average) for 2020 were lower than in 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, and every year from 1990 – 2002: 1990to2020?fbclid=IwAR2vXhTctey2TpMfwTgQQvrYf7PXtuUMpb1gXro-jjqDdde5XEFG44XM_qs

*complete ONS data on annual death and mortality rates date back to 1838 however age age-standardised mortality rates are available from 1942. Overall mortality based upon the age-standardised mortality (1942- 2020), 2020 would rank 68th out of these last 79 years. nualdeathsandmortalityrates1938to2020provisional

What to expect after your Covid19 vaccination - UK Government website: to-expect-after-your-covid-19-vaccination “...Like all medicines, no vaccine is completely effective.... Some people may still get COVID-19 despite having a vaccination .... We do not yet know whether it will stop you from catching and passing on the virus ... So, it is still important to follow the guidance: practice social distancing, wear a face mask...”

UK Government – Summary of further modelling of easing restrictions – Roadmap Step 2 roadmap-step-2-31-march-2021 page 10, paragraph 32: “...The resurgence in both hospitalisations and deaths is dominated by those that have received two doses of the vaccine, comprising around 60% and 70% of the wave respec- tively. This can be attributed to the high levels of uptake in the most at-risk age groups, such that immunisation failures account for more serious illness than unvaccinated individuals....” Page 18, paragraph 56: “Who becomes seriously ill in a resurgence? .... most deaths and admissions in a post-Roadmap resurgence are in people who have received two vaccine doses, even without vaccine protection waning or a variant emerging that escapes vaccines...”

UK Government public speeches related to vaccine certification and how they changed from February to March 2021 – 1min 30 video

UK Government public speeches related to mask wearing by the general public and how they changed from April to June 2020: – 2min video. Up until June 4, the government ministers and their advisers considered the evidence for the use of face masks by the general public to be too weak to recommend it. The latest science continues to support this view, however the Government advice is now to wear face masks.

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 4


01 UK Government information


Although the website is making the adverse reactions data public it is not easy to find or navigate. For easy access to Yellow Card updates look here: UK Column Covid19 vaccine adverse drug reaction (ADR)

reports – (data from MHRA), interactive, easy to follow: Yellow Card Covid 19 Vaccine Adverse Reactions (ADR) reporting - run by the UK Government’s regulatory

agency MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory agency). REPORT ADVERSE REACTIONS HERE UK Government weekly report of Covid19 vaccine adverse reactions as reported on the Yellow card reporting

website (Scroll down web page for links to detailed analysis documents for reactions per vaccine brand): HERE

Updated 10th June 2021 - MHRA Yellow Card Reporting - Pfizer (approx 25,4 million doses), AstraZeneca (approx 40,2 million doses), Moderna (approx 460,000 doses). This report covers period of 9th Dec 2020 to 2nd June 2021:

Total Reactions - 193,768 (Pfizer) + 717,250 (AZ) + 9,243 (M) + 2,335 (Unknown) = Total Reports - 67,998 (Pfizer) + 195,641 (AZ) + 3,278 (M) + 754 (Unknown) = Total Fatalities - 406 (Pfizer) + 864 (AZ) + 4 (M) + 22 (Unknown) = Nervous System disorders (eg; bell’s palsy) - 35,953 (Pfizer) + 151,901 (AZ) + 1,349 (M) + 461 (Unknwn) = Cardiac disorders (eg: heart failures, palpitations) - 2,479 (Pfizer) + 7,494 (AZ) + 61 (M) + 19 (Unknwn) = Immune System disorders (e.g Anaphylaxis) - 1,064 (Pfizer) + 2,441 (AZ) + 78 (M) + 10 (Unknwn) = Blood disorders (eg: thrombotic disorders) - 6,715 (Pfizer) + 6,331 (AZ) + 174 (M) + 27 (Unknwn) = Vascular disorders (eg: embolism, haemorrhages) - 2,901 (Pfizer) + 10,045 (AZ) + 117 (M) + 40 (Unknwn) = Infections (eg: covid19, sepsis, lung infections) - 4,839 (Pfizer) + 15,278 (AZ) + 159 (M) + 64 (Unknwn) = General disorders (eg: sudden death, pain) - 53,534 (Pfizer) + 227,588 (AZ) + 2,583 (M) + 705 (Unknwn) = Respiratory, Breathing disorders - 8,314 (Pfizer) + 23,439 (AZ) + 241 (M) + 72 (Unknwn) = Skin disorders - 14,351 (Pfizer) + 43,758 (AZ) + 1,870 (M) + 158 (Unknwn) = Gastrointestinal disorders (eg: colitis, hernias) - 19,679 (Pfizer) + 70,843 (AZ) + 689 (M) + 222 (Unknwn) = Muscle & tissue disorders (eg: arthritis, pain) - 25,054 (Pfizer) + 87,500 (AZ) + 998 (M) + 261 (Unknwn) = Ear disorders (eg: tinnitus, hearing loss) - 2,589 (Pfizer) + 7,656 (AZ) + 72 (M) + 30 (Unknwn) = Eye disorders (eg: impairment, blindness) - 3,244 (Pfizer) + 11,480 (AZ) + 98 (M) + 37 (Unknwn) = Metabolic disorders (eg: diabetes mellitus) - 1,177 (Pfizer) + 7,854 (AZ) + 32 (M) + 43 (Unknwn) = Reproductive disorders (eg: erection, menopausal) - 2,777 (Pfizer) + 6,454 (AZ) + 277 (M) + 27 (Unknwn) = Pregnancy (Spont. abortion, still birth, foetal death) - 150 (Pfizer) + 184 (AZ) + 8 (M) + 2 (Unknwn) = Injuries (e.g skin, delivery, lactation) - 1,964 (Pfizer) + 6,517 (AZ) + 119 (M) + 35 (Unknwn) = Psychiatric disorders (e.g depression, anxiety) - 3,514 (Pfizer) + 14,510 (AZ) + 162 (M) + 56 (Unknwn) =

922,596 267,671 1,296 192,664 10,053 3,593 13,227 13,103 20,340 284,412 32,066 60,137 91,433 113,813 10,400 14,859 9,106 9,535 344 8,635 18,242

It is widely recognised that, on average, only 10% of serious adverse reactions are actually reported to the MHRA. The percentage is far less for non-serious reactions. This suggests that approximately 2 million people should be filing a Yellow Card. This equates to 1 AE Yellow Card injury or death for every 16 people. The vaccine therefore carries a 1 in 16 risk of life impacting/limiting injury or death. Covid19 carries 99.9% survival rate.

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 5


02 Medical and Scientific Communities


These are just some of the communities that have formed in the UK and world wide to address their concerns and encourage an open debate on topics surrounding the governments’ responses to the respiratory virus SARS CoV-2 and the disease COVID19. These groups are non-profit, consist of members who work voluntarily, offer- ing their skill set to contribute to informed policymaking and decisioning. They are not aligned with any political entities and are often funded only by their members, speaking engagements and the public.

PANDA - Pandemics ~ Data & Analytics

This is a collective of leading scientists, actuaries, economists, data scientists, statisticians, medical profession- als, lawyers, engineers and businesspeople working together with the aim of promoting ‘open science, human agency and courageous societies, empowering the public with accurate information thereby enabling individuals to exercise freedom of choice and preserve human liberties and free societies’. See the link above for their very informative articles on various topics.

HART – Health Advisory and Recovery Team

Is a group of highly qualified UK doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists and other academic experts. Their core aim is to find the common ground between the Government and groups that are concerned about COVID-19 restrictions.

The ambition is to bring all sides together and to widen the debate in order to formulate an exit strategy that benefits everyone in society. Consultations from HART are founded on scientific, evidence-based principles in the interests of public health. HART wants to encourage clear, calm and compassionate discussions. See the link above for their hugely informative bulletin on various topics.

Front Line Covid19 Critical Care

The FLCCC Alliance was organized in March, 2020 by a group of highly published, world renowned Critical Care physician/scholars – with the academic support of allied physicians from around the world – to research and develop lifesaving protocols for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 in all stages of illness.

UK Medical Freedom Alliance

This is an alliance of UK medical professionals, scientists and lawyers who have found that the Government’s response to COVID-19 is misguided and not based upon the best available scientific evidence. Their goal is to preserve and protect Medical Freedom, Informed Consent and Bodily Autonomy. The UKMFA website contains many useful resources and links, including comprehensive vaccine information as well as very informative open letters on many topics such as vaccine passports, vaccine mandates, mass testing at schools, that UKMFA sends to Government and regulators or that you can download, sign and send to your MP, employer, school etc...

World Doctors Alliance

WDA is an independent non-profit alliance of doctors, nurses, healthcare professionals and staff around the world who have united to share experiences and debate the most urgent and important issues surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic. Scroll down on their home page for their open letter, summarizing these issues in a clear way with references.

The Great Barrington Declaration

A declaration, with over 850,000 signatures, where public health scientists and infectious disease epidemiolo- gists express their concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID 19 policies and recommend a different approach.

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 6


02 Medical & Scientific Communities

Primary Doctor Medical Journal: A peer-reviewed journal by physicians and scientists without commercial influence. Currently exploring methodology used in covid response and providing well researched papers.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr – The Defender The Defender is a unique platform for frank, civil, non-partisan discussions of evidence-based science and medicine. News and views on various topics related, amongst others, to vaccines, food safety, and here covid topics:

UK Lawyers for liberty – Democracy declaration
UK lawyers, fighting against a permanent shift of power towards the executive. Such permanent changes in the

balance of power present profound and long-term impacts on the rule of law and our rights.

“No matter what your view is on lockdowns, the truth of the matter is that we are no longer in an emergency situation. Our government, however, are still operating falsely in emergency mode and relying on emergency powers to the exclusion and suspension of the ordinary functioning of the country.”

Swiss Policy Research

Clear, brief referenced facts about covid19. Includes graphs and statistics, available in many languages. Starting with: Lethality: According to the latest immunological studies, the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) of covid-19 in the general population is about 0.1% to 0.5% in most countries, which is most closely comparable to the medium influenza pandemics of 1957 and 1968.

Many more medical, scientific and legal communities (some of them listed below under sections What can I do and Legal Actions) have formed to challenge the science presented by SAGE – the Government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, whose input is responsible for government policies:

SAGE meeting minutes and supporting papers: sponse-to-coronavirus-covid-19#meeting-minutes-and-supporting-papers

Dr Mike Yeadon on SAGE - in this article:

“In spring 2020, membership of SAGE was initially treated like a state secret. Eventually, membership was revealed. I looked up the credentials of all the members. There were no clinical immunologists. No one who had a biology degree and a post-doctoral qualification in immunology. A few medics, sure. Several people from the humanities including so- ciologists, economists, psychologists and political theorists. No clinical immunologists. What there were in profusion – seven in total – were mathematicians. This comprised the modelling group. ... I cannot stress how important it is, when- ever you hear the word “model”, that you ask who has the expertise in the thing that’s purportedly being modelled...”

(Dr Mike Yeadon has a degree in biochemistry and toxicology and a research-based PhD in respiratory pharmacology. He has spent over 30 years leading new medicines research in some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies, leaving Pfizer in 2011 as Vice President & Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory. That was the most senior research position in this field in Pfizer. Since leaving Pfizer, Dr Yeadon has founded his own biotech company, Ziarco, which was sold to the worlds biggest drug company, Novartis, in 2017.)

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 7


03 Fundamental Paradigms


Views and paradigms that underline our view of, and response to, the current situation. This section explores some of the following questions, because how we choose to answer informs and directs our response to this and any pandemic and to our visions of the future: Who are we? What is our relationship to nature? What role do we play within nature and what consequences does that bring? What is our perception of viruses, science, death and life? How have we arrived where we are now? Where are we heading?

(NOTE: We consider this content to be crucial to how we think and act in general, but especially now, in the current situation. We believe the time spent to open our minds and hearts to these thoughts is invaluable. However, in case you prefer to deal with other topics first, there’s a page at the end of this document that very briefly summarizes the main thoughts explored here.)

Zach Bush MD – Video interviews. A triple board-certified physician specializing in internal medicine, endocri- nology and hospice care, focused on the relationship between the microbiome, the virome, disease and food production systems (his informative website: He is a critical voice in the conversation we need to have in this unprecedented moment of global challenge. He shares his perspective on the current sit- uation in many interviews that look at the reasons and causes behind what is happening, how to best navigate it, and what this situation signifies for humanity and the future of planetary ecology. Out of the many inspirational interviews we recommend these, we truly believe it is worth the time:

20min video interview - on the innate immune system, vaccines and also on covid19 in the context of the vi- rome. Great video presenting a wider perspective and the big picture in context:

50min video interview - on corona viruses, pandemics, the importance of viruses, PCR tests, covid vaccines, flu vaccines, why experts are divided in their views, where we are now, sociological viewpoint..... Very interesting, summarizes it all, the macro as well as the micro view:

35min video interview - explaining genomics, the virome, where Covid stands from that perspective and why viruses are needed :

45min video interview - on the innate and adaptive immune system and vaccine interference and consequences:

30min video interview - on herd biological update vs herd immunity, on antibodies vs immunity, PCR tests, where we are heading - rise in consciousness:

1h20min video interview – in the first 9min Zach Bush shares his story, then continues about covid19, how he sees it, presenting deep and wide consequences and reasons for the current situation being as it is and why our fear of death is important to consider and challenge:

1h50min video interview - “a pandemic of possibility
3h video interview - What happened last year – deep and detailed thoughts and science. If nothing, watch the

first 20min before he dives deeper into the science.

Macro implications of the Microbiome (Functional Forum) – by Sayer Ji: – 28min video + his article about viruses:

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 8


03 Fundamental Paradigms

The coronation essay – by Charles Eisenstein. One of the deepest integrative thinkers active today, focusing on themes of human cultural evolution, economics and consciousness. The coronation essay is one of the most insightful and well-considered long reads to date on how to think expansively about our current moment. Listen here:
Read here:
Interview, video 1h38min:

Pathogens in one lesson – courtesy of Sunetra Gupta. An article introducing a book Pandemics: Our Fears and the Facts written in 2013 by Sunetra Gupta, Oxford University theoretical epidemiologist, one of the signers of the Great Barrington Declaration. “With computer viruses, the way to deal with them is to block them. Our operating systems must remain perfectly clean and free of all pathogens. For the machine to work properly, its memory must be pure and unexposed. One exposure could mean data loss, identity theft, and even machine death. Despite what Bill Gates seems to believe, our bodies are not the same. Exposure to milder forms of germs works to protect us against more severe forms. The cell memory of our body is trained through experience, not by blocking all bugs but by incorporating the capacity to fight them off into our biology.”

Is The Germ/Virus Theory Valid?

In recent years, and especially since the alleged pandemic started, doctors such as Dr Tom Cowan, Dr Andrew Kaufman and former virologist Stefan Lanka have been challenging the virus theory narrative and highlighting the lack of solid science behind this alleged virus, the alleged transmission, alleged contagiousness resulting
in the alleged disease. Since Louis Pasteur’s theory was embraced there have been concerns and criticism but these have been dismissed, and mostly kept from the public domain over the years. Here are a few links bringing into question virology and germ/disease theory.

Stefan Lanka Virologist -
Control Experiment Refutes Virology - https:/ Statement on Virus Isolation (SOVI) -
The Contagion Myth -
Virus Mania -
Do viruses cause disease? - The real science of germs, Andrew Kaufman. A discussion between Dr Andrew Kaufman, Dawn Lester and David Parker challenging the germ theory - https:/
Germ Theory vs Terrain Theory – Dr Sam Bailey - https:/ – 15mins video.

Photo by Kunal Shinde on

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 9


04 Data



“It is very important to avoid conflating the virus and the disease. SARS CoV-2 is a respiratory virus. If you contract that virus, you will likely have mild symptoms. In rarer cases, SARS CoV-2 can lead to a more severe collection of symptoms, characterising a disease we call COVID-19... By referring to the virus and the disease interchangeably, we end up with unnecessary panic.” ~ HART – Health Advisory and Recovery Team (week 5th March):


.. We have identified around 120 corona viruses, cold like syndromes, that affect the upper respiratory system (cough, sore throat, congestion)... In the last 20 years these viruses present clinically differently, affecting lower respiratory sys- tem – deep lungs and vascular system – in 2001/2 there was SARS 1 (burnt itself out in 18-24 months), in 2012 there was MERS (gone within 2 years), now SARS-CoV2 would follow the same pattern, it burns itself out as the humanity and water, soil and air system comes into balance with it...”

(+ More on vaccines, flu and PCR tests in those 9 minutes of the video (more on PCR tests later in the video) Mortality data and Covid19 – Joel Smalley, Quantitative Data Analyst

“Viruses tend to follow a predictable self-limiting path .... because (a) herd immunity increases over time and (b) there are fewer susceptible individuals available as the most vulnerable succumb early on in the outbreak. In addition, viruses are known to mutate to become less virulent over time, hence increasing their own chances of survival and replication by not killing their host.”

Also on p. 31 of the rigorously and widely researched document:

HART Covid19 Response:



CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 10


04 Data


UK Government Website – The R number in the UK. “The reproduction number (R) is the average number of secondary infections produced by a single infected person. An R value of 1 means that on average every person who is infected will infect 1 other person, meaning the total number of infections is stable. If R is 2, on average, each infected person infects 2 more people. If R is 0.5 then on average for each 2 infected people, there will be only 1 new infection. If R is greater than 1 the epidemic is growing, if R is less than 1 the epidemic is shrinking. The higher R is above 1, the more people 1 infected person infects and so the faster the epidemic grows.”

Despite the main government page on the R number ( shows it to be between 0.8 to 1.0 and the growth rate between -4% to 0%per day, the SAGE meeting minutes from the 11th may state these figures: uploads/attachment_data/file/975918/S1141_SAGE_83_minutes.pdf


(Which means that, on average, every 10 people infected will infect between 8 and 10 other people)

Latest growth rate range for England -7% to -4% per day

(Which means that the number of new infections is broadly flat or shrinking by up to 4% every day)

... Which means “the epidemic / pandemic is on its way out” as Chris Whitty explains back in 2018 in his presen- tation on Epidemics, Pandemics and how to control them:

6 min video


You might have heard the (most probably discredited) argument, that the virus SARS-CoV2 has not been isolat- ed. Dr Sam Bailey in this video explains, that “none of the authors of the isolation papers claimed that they had a purified sample” ... “if nobody had purified the virus, how do they get the genetic sequence? These new viral sequences are created by PCR” ... “There is over 225.000 EUR up for grabs for anyone that can prove the actual isolation and its genetics substance.” (Isolate Truth Fund) At the time of recording this video, there were not takers. minute 3:30-6:15 of this video. Isolate Truth Fund:

The truth about virus isolation - Dr Sam Bailey - 14min video.
In an internet search: ‘Has the SARS-CoV2 virus been isolated’ , one of the first links provides an article from

Full Fact – The Covid19 virus has been isolated many times:

But who is Full Fact and who are they funded by? More on Full Fact website under Censorship section further down. It’s not always obvious what’s is true and what is not. We all have to research thoroughly and decide for ourselves.

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 11


04 Data


Myths of surface transmission of a respiratory virus “Finally,” said Linsey Marr, an expert on airborne viruses at Virginia Tech. “We’ve known this for a long time and yet people are still focusing so much on surface cleaning.” She added, “There’s really no evidence that anyone has ever gotten Covid-19 by touching a contaminated surface.”

Swiss Policy research: Transmission: According to current knowledge, the main routes of transmission of the virus are indoor aerosols and droplets produced when speaking or coughing, while outdoor aerosols as well as most object surfaces appear to play a minor role. The coronavirus season in the northern hemisphere lasts from about November to April.

Zach Bush MD – on corona viruses, pandemics, the importance of viruses, PCR tests, covid vaccines, flu vaccines, why experts are divided in their views, where we are now, sociological viewpoint..... Very interesting, summarizes it all, the macro as well as the micro view:

“There are more viruses on the Earth than there are stars in the known Universe – in the air we breath (only a few of them we have gained insight into, sequenced and named). Billions and billions respiratory viruses that we are in an innate relationship with and are not causing us any harm. There’s a tiny segment of these that are related to a clinical syndrome (e.g. common cold, flu or Covid19). If there is a syndrome that gets associated with one of these viruses,

it means that this particular genetic information (the virus) is producing proteins that are extremely activating our immune system. Why is that important? Because the immune system is not there to fight off the world – that’s the old paradigm we are still in and we’re still encouraged to believe.”


*How the WHO definition of Heard immunity changed from June to November 2020:

Zach Bush MD – Herd biological update vs
Herd immunity, antibodies vs immunity. How the concept of herd immunity is mistaken on many levels and more. 30min video:


CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 12


04 Data


See section “Views to the near future” further down. B) DATA IN CONTEXT:

Since the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 global pandemic, many issues have arisen that run contrary to historical precedents and known and practiced public health principles of the last century. This article discusses some of these issues.

Context is extremely important. It provides a framework to put the figures into. It is important to consider and include the figures representing the collateral harm of the Government policy response in order to fully understand the cause and effect of harm and death related to the pandemic.

Summary of Covid-19 data and measures (The Ugly Truth of Covid-19 Lockdowns) - Nick Hudson, co-founder of PANDA, Pandemics – Data & Analytics. - 27min video

Nick Hudson, speaking at the inaugural BizNews Investment Conference in March 2021 summarizing and looking into the data and measures and interventions, putting things into context

Interview with Nick Hudson, founder of PANDA (Pandemics – Data and Analytics), calm and gentle, full of facts, from all aspects of the pandemic and the global policy response:

https:/ – 45min.

Making sense of mortality – 1h30min video well worth the time, full of ONS data analysed, modelled and explained to lay people by experienced Quantitative Analyst, MBA, Joel Smalley. Explaining clearly excess deaths, touching upon hospital bed occupancy, numbers of covid deaths in spring and autumn, distinguishing community and care homes and explaining current surge in deaths on clear models with official data. After some hesitancy to speak out, he says: “Context is very important and is often lost with the singular focus on covid. Data reveal the truth. As a citizen I feel obliged to share that truth, especially if I think the harm is being done or is not being undone as a result of trying to hide that truth”.

Mortality data and Covid19 – Joel Smalley, Quantitative Data Analyst.
Also on p. 31 of the rigorously and widely researched document:
HART Covid19 Response:

What does the data show? - Pandemic Podcast

“We’ve been repeatedly told there is only one way out of the restrictions we’ve been living under since March last year and even though the goalposts are forever being shifted .... What does the data actually show us? In this video we will be taking a deep dive into official statistics from 10 of the countries where the steamroller first rocked up at the end of 2020 and on into this year...”

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 13


04 Data

HART – Health Advisory and Recovery Team Previously mentioned, HART aims for open debate and scientific and evidence-based explanations.

From their weekly bulletin on current data in context: “...excess deaths, now shows that deaths are below normal levels for the time of year. As there is a 23 day window between contracting infection and death, this shows that trans- mission levels have been essentially zero for nearly a month now....” (dated 11th March 2021).

“ ... people coming to A&E with an acute respiratory infection is almost as low as the summer minimum and well below normal for the time of year. This would suggest that any pressure the NHS is experiencing is not related to community spread of SARS-CoV-2....” (dated 11th March 2021).

“....99.9% of people under 70 years and with no underlying conditions survive the virus .”
“ ...The median age at death with Covid19 (around 82 years) exceeds normal life expectancy....”
“ ...The majority of those who died with the virus also had two or more serious, chronic illnesses.,..”

“ ...In 2020, there were 388 Covid19 deaths in those aged 60 or and under with no prior illnesses...” (UK) (all of the above quotes are from HART weekly bulletin dated 19th February 2021)

“...Perhaps the most useful measure available to us is all-cause mortality. When you look at the last 20 years, it certainly puts recent events in context...”: (dated 25th February 2021).

Office for National Statistics (ONS) website: *death rates per year in the U.K 1990 to December 2020 a table showing that the Age Standardised Mortality rates (the true average) for 2020 were lower than in 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, and every year from 1990 – 2002: transparencyandgovernance/freedo- mofinformationfoi/deathsintheukfrom- 1990to2020?fbclid=IwAR2vXhTctey2TpM- fwTgQQvrYf7PXtuUMpb1gXro-jjqDdde5X- EFG44XM_qs

*Complete ONS data on annual death and
mortality rates date back to 1838 however age-standardised mortality rates are available from 1942.

Overall mortality based upon the age-standardised mortality (1942-2020), 2020 would rank 68th out of these last 79 years. hocs/12735annualdeathsandmortalityrates1938to2020provisional

Similar situation in Ireland – Irish death rates graphically explained using official statistics Ivor Cummins video:

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 14


04 Data

Summary by The World Doctors Alliance:

“Leading medical journal the BMJ published a peer-reviewed article last week by John Appleby, Director of Research at the Nuffield Trust, that draws on ONS data to look at the 2020 England and Wales death toll in a historical context.

In terms of absolute number of deaths, 2020 was the worst year since 1838 except for the Spanish Flu year of 1918 (note that overseas deaths including war casualties are not included). However, as a proportion of population, it was only the worst year since 2003. Furthermore, once you take into account the fact that the population is getting older and standardise the figures by age, 2020 was less deadly than 2008 and every year prior to it. Appleby for his part makes no attempt to downplay the pandemic death toll, pointing out that only in four previous years had there been a sharper increase in percentage terms on the previous year and they were all prior to 1941. It was definitely counter to the decreasing trend.

A point he doesn’t make, however, is that the historically low levels of the previous 11 years would have left an unusually large amount of ‘dry tinder’ for any novel virus to burn through. Plus, 2019 had the lowest age-standardised mortality ever, to the extent that if you took an average of 2019 and 2020 then that average was lower than 2015, 2013, 2012 and every year prior to 2011. While it’s fair to note (as Appleby does) that the coronavirus epidemic continued into 2021, with high excess deaths in January and February, it is hard to regard this as an earth-shattering death toll. The graphs also make clear that previous similar pandemics, such as in 1957 and 1968, made only a modest impact on mortality and only for a year or two, notwithstanding the lack of vaccines or social interventions. There is nothing about this disease to think the long-term pattern should be any different that would justify some kind of radical, permanent change to the way we interact or organise our lives. It’s important to remember that our immune systems develop and maintain resistance to a host of pathogens through being frequently exposed to them and that social isolation, where it is not merely ineffective, can deprive us of the opportunity to keep our immunity topped up.”

An article showing the document released by the ONS: ‘Coronavirus: a year like no other’ in a different light when the small print within the data that ONS presents is taken into account. lated/

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 15


04 Data


Some of the data used to explain, justify and form the basis of all measures and the mainstream media narrative


Neil Ferguson’s Imperial College warned Boris Johnson last year that, without an immediate lockdown, the coronavirus would cause 500,000 deaths. This figure, has been recognized as exaggerated (as have been
N. Ferguson’s predictions for foot-and-mouth disease in 2001, mad cow disease in 2002, bird flu in 2005, and swine flu in 2007). N. Ferguson himself admitted his model was based on undocumented, 13-year-old computer code that had been intended for use in a feared influenza pandemic. Ferguson’s model has been roundly attacked as not based on science, but on projected death rates which were much higher than the present estimated 99.8% plus survival rate of COVID19. His predictions were never validated against the data that comes out empirically, week by week. If this had been done it would have been seen quickly that the model was ‘badly specified, ‘not
on the side of caution but completely reckless considering the collateral damage of the policy response that was based on this prediction.’ Despite all this evidence, lockdowns and other measures remain official policy. Sources for these statements:
Making sense of mortality – Quantitative Analyst, MBA, Joel Smalley mentioned above. Talking about Ferguson’s model from minute 32 of the video https:/


Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, explains here: “with the PCR if you do it well you can find almost anything in anybody ... It allows you to take a very minuscule amount of anything, make it measurable ... it’s about interpretation .... it doesn’t tell you that you are sick, it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with is really going to hurt you...” 1:30min video:

Dr. Sam Bailey – clear short videos explaining how PCR test works. Clear, science based.

Behind the PCR curtain: - 11min.

The truth about PCR tests: - 17min.

Who Fact-Checks the Fact-Checkers? - One of her videos on PCR tests has been “fact checked”. She follows the fact checkers, their arguments and explains her claims on scientific, referenced basis: 10min video.
FAQs: re Lateral flow and PCR tests & more 14min.

HART – Health Advisory and Recovery Team. “.. To minimise inappropriate focus on just one of many respiratory viruses... an in-depth review of testing and revised testing strategy is needed, with focus on reliable identification of those who are both clinically infected and infectious.” (25th Feb)

talkRadio – 9min video with Dr Mike Yeadon, former scientific advisor with Pfizer, explaining why the PCR is unreliable and so are admission, cases and deaths numbers that all hang on this test.

Prof. Carl Heneghan: PCR Test Positives Up to 78 Days After Having Had the Virus – 2min video by Professor Carl Heneghan is the Director of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University.

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 16


04 Data

Prof. Vincent Racaniello – 14min detailed explanation of how PCR test works, what is the Ct value & why there’s no need to worry about a positive test result:

PCR Claims:
A wealth of evidence, resources – articles, videos, news and useful links related to PCR tests.
PCRclaims: a campaign group that collates claims information relating to individual losses driven by PCR testing.

‘Every scary thing you are being told depends on the unreliable PCR test’

A video summarizing the pitfalls of the PCR Test and why it should not be treated as a legitimate medical diag- nostic tool, but rather only, as Mullis himself instructed, as an auxiliary ‘research aid’. This has been censored/ removed. However the valuable research links for this video and notes are still provided here:



Head of the WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, on June 7, 2020 told a press conference that from the known research, asymptomatic spread was “very rare.” : “From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.... very rare... We should focus on detecting and isolating infected people with symptoms”. Here is the article about the context and implications of this speech (1:46min video included) ed/?fbclid=IwAR2BUpRdupamYZ-LsictUcAQt6-Jh8YQSul9YJUMm2xHmGpZwnRLhI54oAI

Covid19 – Asymptomatic transmission – Dr. Sam Bailey eo-:e?r=Hi235fbeSxXgEvHPARxCiew2F8RbaKHc 13min video

The BJM (British Medical Journal) – article:

Response to Mass testing for Covid19 in the UK: “Evidence of asymptomatic spread is insufficient to justify mass testing for Covid-19”

Dr Jay Bhattacharya – on asymptomatic spread (min 4-11 of this 48min audio interview on The Tom Woods Show – + also discussed: censorship, lockdowns, US public health institutions, vaccines, vaccine passports. Dr Jay Bhattacharya – Professor of medicine at Standford University and one of the three drafters of The Great Barrington Declaration. “The risk of transmission of the virus within the members of one household is 18%” (high enough if there’s a really vulnerable person – then, it’s about protecting the vulnerable), but rest of the people should be free to live their lives! Compare this 18% chance of transmission within the household to other indoor and outdoor settings – supermarkets, restaurants... the risk of transmission there is much lower than that. “ People overestimate the risk of the disease spread. .... people living in fear ... fear driving all these measures ... why not just tell people, if you are sick stay at home and isolate yourself.”

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 17


04 Data

Smashing the “1 in 3 people with Covid-19 have no symptoms” claim – with Professor Norman Fenton – Queen Mary University of London – 6 minutes video

“Over the period Dec 2020 - Feb 2021, the UK government, and its scientific advisers, made the persistent and widely publicised claim that “1 in 3 people with the SARS-Cov-2 virus have no symptoms”. We use a contemporaneous study of asymptomatics at Cambridge University to show that the claim is contradicted by the government’s own case num- bers over that same period.”

Full paper is here: COVID-19_do_not_get_symptoms

Asymptomatic Spread – Who can really spread Covid19? - Dr John Lee, retired Professor of Pathology:

“...Three situations when someone can be PCR positive, but asymptomatic: Pre-symptomatic – max 7% of the spread (according to the CDC, reference in the article), False positive – not infected, Immunity – people who have the virus on board (detectable), but never develop symptoms...Transmission risk is minimal”

...” A respiratory virus needs associated symptoms in order to be clinically relevant. One year ago, this belief would have been universally accepted by wider medical community....”

Also on p. 11 of the rigorously and widely researched document: HART Covid19 Response:

+ Also in HART’s bulletin from week 25th February 2021: :

Assessing asymptomatic transmission’s role in the pandemic:

“...Prior to 2020 the default assumption was that only symptomatic individuals are at high risk of infecting others with a respiratory pathogen... The entire rationale for mask wearing and mass testing is based on the assumption of the importance of asymptomatic transmission being correct. However, when the source data was reviewed this assump- tion was called into question....Empirical data show that transmission risk is very variable and is much greater in those displaying symptoms...A high proportion of infections have been acquired in institutions....COVID-19 may be well on its way to becoming predominantly a disease of institutional spread, as was the case with prior novel coronaviruses. HART recommends urgently undertaking a detailed, multi-disciplinary review of the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions in community and institutional settings....”



Government website: New UK-wide methodology to record Covid19 deaths, adopted in August 2020

Daily published COVID-19 deaths are “deaths in people with COVID-19 that occurred within 28 days of testing positive”. ...meaning death from any cause within 28 days of testing positive. When we factor in prevalence of false positives, we can imagine the scale of inaccuracy and what sort of image such a Covid-19 death number presented in the news can create.

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 18


04 Data

From this government source about the reasons for this methodology of recording covid19 deaths:

Professor John Newton, Director of Health Improvement at Public Health England, said: “The way we count deaths in people with COVID-19 in England was originally chosen to avoid underestimating deaths caused by the virus in the early stages of the pandemic.” Putting that into context:

EMERGENCY MEASURE IS STILL IN PLACE (relates to the statement above)

UK Government admitting in April 2021 - QUARTER OF VIRUS DEATHS NOT CAUSED BY COVID. Calls to speed up roadmap as 23% of recent deaths are “with” the disease rather than “from” it. - Front page of The Daily Telegraph 14th April 2021 (note: BBC News front page on that day does not mention anything. What does that tell us?)

“Almost a quarter of registered covid deaths are people who are not dying from the disease... new official figures show as the government was urged to move faster with the roadmap” ... 23% of people who died.

For this very information people were getting de-platformed not long ago – now officially confirmed. And the number might be much higher than that.

Scottish Government response to Freedom of Information request: COVID-19: Number of Scottish deaths with no underlying health condition. Information requested : The figure of deaths in Scotland for the period of 3/3/2020 till 1/2/2021 of citizens whom have died solely of COVID-19 with no whatsoever underlying con- ditions. Response: The answer to your question is 596 deaths involving COVID-19 has been registered where there was no pre-existing medical condition between March 2020 and January 2021 (including).

Also covered by UK Column News: min 21:44 in

Official NHS data shows only 3,542 died with no known pre-existing conditions

“Of the 86,308 deaths occurring in people who have tested positive for “Covid”, 82,766 died from pre-existing conditions. Only 3,542 died with no known pre-existing conditions.” What’s even more shocking about that is that this doesn’t mean the 3,542 who died with no known pre-existing conditions actually died of Covid-19. It just means they didn’t have any pre-existing conditions. This very small amount of people in the grand scheme of things could actually be even smaller, as it is entirely possible they still died of other causes, such as a bad car accident for instance. We cannot of course prove that but it is still entirely possible due to the fact they record Covid deaths as anyone who ha died within 28 days of receiving a positive test for SARS-CoV-2. But we can prove what some of the underlying pre-existing conditions were, as the NHS have told us.”


A deceptive construction: Why we must question the Covid-19 mortality statistics - UK Column News

“According to the UK Government, as of 27 March 2021, 126,515 people have died as a result of contracting Covid-19, and an additional 21,610 people have died with COVID-19 on their death certificates. The government alleges, therefore, that a total of 148,125 people in the UK have died as a result of COVID-19’ Is this claim credible?”

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 19


04 Data

Covid-19: The data exposing the deception – UK Column News

Research suggests that: “the average percentage chance of Covid-19 mortality for the working population is 0.0046%. This is three and half times lower than the official ONS ASMR (Age-Standardised Mortality Rate) implies. This strongly suggests that, of the 48,158 reported deaths “due” to Covid-19, the real number is closer to 13,759. A discrepancy of 34,399. Why the discrepancy?....”

How deadly is Covid19? - Dr. Malcolm Kendrick. Scottish medical doctor, who spent large chunks of his life trying to untangle medial data and research, explaining in this article how deadly covid19 is, looking at Infection Fatality Rate and Case Fatality Rate.

Mortality Realities - Professor Michael Levitt Explains Fully. Interview with Nobel Prize winner - Professor Michael Levitt of Stanford University on mortality data from CDC, and/or Euromomo databases.
HART – Health Advisory and Recovery Team (25th Feb):

“.... Data on COVID-19 mortality is centred on all deaths within 28 days of a PCR positive. Regardless of the prevalence of false positives, the genuine presence of a respiratory virus does not necessarily implicate the virus in the patient’s death. It is being assumed that where PCR positives indicate the presence of SARS-CoV-2, the virus has contributed in some way to the death. We have never adopted this system for any other virus..”

(HART bulletin week 25th February 2021)

“Perhaps the most useful measure available to us is all-cause mortality. When you look at the last 20 years, it certainly puts recent events in context...

With every death comes personal tragedy, nevertheless it is important to remember:

99.9% of people under 70 years and with no underlying conditions survive the virus.
The majority of those who died with the virus also had two or more serious, chronic illnesses. The median age at death with Covid19 (around 82 years) exceeds normal life expectancy.
In 2020, there were 388 Covid19 deaths in those aged 60 or and under with no prior illnesses.

HART bulletin week 19th February 2021:


NHS hospitals have four times more empty beds than normal – article from April 2020


“Tens of thousands of NHS hospital beds remain unoccupied amid the coronavirus crisis — about four times the normal number — due to huge ongoing efforts to free up space, and a slowdown in admissions from other causes.”

Nightingale largely empty as ICUs handle surge – article from April 2020. article

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 20


04 Data

Has the NHS been overwhelmed during the pandemic? - Investigation.
Daily Expose - Referenced article with bed occupancy data


“Night after night a recurring media theme over the past year has been harrowing images of over-stretched staff in their PPE rushing from bed to bed in overflowing ICU wards. This unrelenting barrage of distress has underpinned the entire ‘protect the NHS’ messaging campaign but is what we’ve been seeing — and still see, even now — a complete picture of what’s actually been going on? More and more health staff are now speaking out, putting their livelihoods in peril and jeopardising professional and other relationships in the process. Among them is Kirsty Miller, an experienced nurse who worked for NHS Tayside and quit at the end of March after raising in vain a growing catalogue of concerns with her managers, her union, government health bodies, and the Nursing and Midwifery Council. The emotional video she made sitting in a hospital car park after working her last shift went viral, and now Kirsty wants as many people as possible to start questioning what’s happening in the NHS and care sector. Kirsty is sharing her story, touching on emp- ty wards, elderly patients being pushed to sign DNRs (Do Not Resuscitate), and how her whistle-blowing at a Dundee care home early last year also fell on deaf ears” (52min video)

Exercise Cygnus: UK Government Exercise Justifies Covid-19 Lockdown – UK Column News

Article explores the steady decline in the number of ICU beds from 1997 up to now, it then explores the UK Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Strategy Paper published by the UK government in 2011, followed in 2016 by a government-organized event called Exercise Cygnus, which involved all government departments, all local authorities, and the NHS across the UK and which report has not been published for “national security reasons” and so as not to “frighten the public”....

“To get a general feel, looking back to 2011, the government published the UK Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Strategy Paper, outlining what the official response to a hypothetical pandemic should be. Its precautionary approach stresses that actions following the emergence of a pandemic, which could occur suddenly at any time:

must be evidence based
be proportional to the level of threat
be flexible
be based on ethical principles.
emergency powers must last no longer than 30 days

Significantly, it states that during any pandemic, it should be “business as usual” and notes that its recommendations are in line with an earlier, 2007, National Framework paper’s “defence in depth” approach to a pandemic.”

He who controls the media controls the public mind. ~ Noam Chomsky

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 21


05 Media information campaign


The above data, out of context, with a singular focus on Covid19 has formed the basis for unprecedented measures and interventions. After an immediate and willing response amongst the vast majority of people to respond as advised to the initial sense of emergency, the continuing collective compliance with these measures, in the face of growing scientific questioning as to the actions of Governments, has been largely achieved by a relentless and aggressive media campaign.

Psychological impact of Government’s communication style – Dr Damian Wild, Chartered, Highly Specialist Clinical Psychologist.

“The communication style used throughout this crisis has employed several covert psychological strategies
(“nudges”) that act upon us subconsciously, below the level of awareness.” “
The Government’s Behavioural Insight Team (BIT) recommended many psychological techniques in order to change people’s behaviour. The SAGE minutes of the 22nd March 2020 state: “The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased ... using hard-hitting emotional messaging.” “BIT has inflicted a prolonged scare campaign upon the British public, the primary aim of which has been to inflate levels of fear and thereby achieve compliance.” “The government has spent well over £100M on advertising Covid-19-related messaging. It has resulted in unprecedented levels of fear, loneliness and anxiety.”

Also on p.25 of the rigorously and widely researched document: HART Covid-19 Response:

The government have just extended contract for Covid-19 advertising until 2023.

(See further down this document).
NHS England and NHS Improvement – NHS internal document / script on strategies and key messages to use to

persuade different age groups to say to say yes to the vaccine. – 9 min video. Operation Fear: How are we being played? - Pandemic Podcast – interview with behaviour scientist Patrick

Fagan – 1h video How Governments Manipulate Human Behaviour – Pandemic Podcast, Dan Austin Gregory - 34min video – in the first 20min, Dan shows how the Chart/tools of coercion used in the 60s to break down will of the prisoners of war and make them comply is currently being used by the governments (based on Albert Biderman’s book The Manipulation of Human Behaviour from 1961): Isolation, Monopolisation of perception, Induced debility and exhaustion, threats and intimidation, humiliation and degradation, enforcing trivial demands, occasional indulgence, demonstrating omnipotence.

COVID Coercion UK: SAGE Documents Reveal Psychological Operations Against Public tack-on-the-uk-public/ Article introducing SAGE subgroup - Scientific Pandemic Influenza group on Behaviour (SPI-B) , tasked with providing advice on how to ‘help’ people to adhere to the interventions which government demands and quotes their advice to SAGE, e.g: “A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened...The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging.”

CV19 SARS-CoV2: An Exploration > CONTENTS < PAGE 22


05 Media information campaign

SPI-B recommends that the media is used:
to increase sense of personal threat
to increase sense of responsibility to others
to promote positive messaging around actions

“They make clear how they see the role of the media: not to hold government to account, but to act as a conduit for the ‘behavioural’ message (propaganda)”. “It was announced on 17 April 2020 this year that the Government and the newspaper industry have formed a three-month advertising partnership called All in, all together to help “keep the public safe and the nation united” throughout the Covid-19 ‘pandemic’.”

“So news media have a commercial interest in providing a propaganda service to the UK government. Indeed, it has been noticed that the government is becoming the UK media’s most important client.”

SAGE document reveals “covert” propaganda to scare British into staying Home in lockdown to-staying-home/

The paper, written by Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviours, said: “A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened; it could be that they are reassured by the low death rate in their demographic group, although levels of concern may be rising.” “The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging. To be effective this must also empower people by making clear the actions they can take to reduce the threat.”

The document, seen by the Telegraph, allegedly then gave 14 options for improving compliance including ‘use media to increase sense of personal threat’, which they said would be highly effective but runs the risk of ‘negative’ side effects.” The ‘covert tactics’ used to scare Britons into staying at home: How SAGE document called for increase in ‘perceived threat’ of Covid using ‘hard hitting emotional messages’ – Mail Online

The Telegraph: State of fear: how ministers ‘used covert tactics’ to keep scared public at home.

Daily Expose article on UK Government tactics to encourage/coerce/pressure people into getting the vaccine.



The Mirror Project: This is a new non-profit initiative with the mission to contribute to a growing body of unbiased & impartial information, to counter government and corporate media, and give the public a place to investigate issues in a trusted environment with verified sources. Who is behind the project: “We worked in the mainstream media (news & documentaries) for many years. We’ve been to conflict zones, covered wars, and seen things, slowly we started piecing the puzzle together. When the “Pandemic” started we’ve witnessed the mainstream media from the inside trying to push a certain narrative on everyone, including us. We could not participate knowingly, so we left. We left to organise and find legal ways to fight back. And it all starts with educating the public...”