Vaccines are Religion, not Science
Why is this so incredibly important?
Many constitutions in the world have an article that in some way states that the government cannot establish a religion or force a religious practice on the people.
Vaccines are a religion and vaccinations are a (barbaric) religious ritual. That means that any kind of mandatory vaccination law is unconstitutional.
Some people might still play semantics and say that a belief system is not the same as a religion. But let’s look at the vaccine religion.
- – You are expected to go to preparation classes (prenatal check-ups)
- – You are expected to give birth in the temple (=hospital).
- – As soon as the baby is born you are confronted with the temple servants (doctors/nurses/midwives) who want to submit your baby to the standard ritual (two injections)
- – If you decline they usually will try to convince or coerce you
- – At set times after birth you need to bring your baby to another temple (doctor’s practice) for more rituals
- – If you don’t want to submit your baby to the rituals you can expect extremely negative reactions, which can become aggression and end up with you not being welcome in the temple anymore
- – If you lose the faith (or never join in the first place) you can expect social exclusion and often serious family trouble. Some grandparents even consider “saving their grandchildren” by bringing them to the temple themselves, without the parents permission.
Vaccinations have almost every characteristic of a religion, so the desperate argument that a belief system doesn’t equal a religion doesn’t hold up.
Politicians won’t like it, but if you go to court with this you will win and mandatory vaccinations will have to be abandoned, or at least you can stay free of them.
The only thing you need to do is to state that vaccines are a religion and the government is constitutionally banned from mandating a religious practice.
Then sit back and let the other party try to find reasons why vaccines are based on science and not on beliefs. It’s obvious that they won’t find any. And as long as they can’t come up with scientific arguments you win, for then it’s obvious that they only have beliefs.
So why hasn’t this argument been in court yet? I don’t know. But as far as I know nobody has tried it. Nowhere in the world. If you can explain that, please let me know.